Indes West-poli-Ticker und -Wahrheitsmedien alles Wesentliche dröhnend verschweigen oder skrupel- und gewissenlos verdrehen, setzt der US Militärexperte Scott Ritter Marksteine der Wahrheit.

Die wahren Gründe dafür, warum der Bär in der Ukraine eine Militäroperation durchführt.

Russische Militärstrategie und -Taktik. Zu erwartende weitere Schritte.

Militärisches learning by doing, Führungswechsel.

Die wahren militärischen Kraftverhältnisse.

Das Elend. Die Hungersnot.

Das Elend. Männer in sechsstelliger Größenordnung sind umgekommen, Hunderttausende werden folgen. Es bleibt das Leid der Verkrüppelten und das Leid der Hinterbliebenen, der Partnerinnen, der Kinder, der Familien.

.

Scott Ritters Ansagen sind an Klarheit schwer zu toppen – und so weit meine Sicht reicht – wahr.

.

Dreizehn Minuten. Englisch mit deutschen Untertiteln. Ich halte es für wichtig, dieses Video breit zu streuen.

Thom Ram, 04.12.10

.

Minute 09:16

Übersetzungsfehler, Verdreher um 180 Grad.

Summary by Chris Barth

00.00 Russian war updates

00.32 Russia has carried out intense airstrikes on civilian infrastructure in ukraine at interval of 7-10days. Do you think Russia will continue this same strategy in the coming months?

00.39 SCOTT RITTER- Russia has not carried out strikes against civilians but an absurdity, Russia has carried out strikes that reacted to a critical infrastructure targets that relates to the ability of the ukrianian nation to wage war.

02.53 There’s going to be a lot of combat going around bakhmut. What is this particular location?, what makes it so important for bother sides?

03.14 bakhmut has been one of the central battlegrounds for the ongoing effort to liberate Donetsk. Bakhmut is the centerpiece of the ukrianian defense and if they kick bakhmut its opens for the ability to manoeuvre from the all sides. So if bakhmut falls this network of Ukraine defense will collapse.

05.29 Doug Macgregor recently made a forecast in which he expects a strong russian offensive in the coming weeks that will decide the conflict. Do you have a similar view?

05.44 Yes, I mean Russia mobilised 300,000 troops for a purpose and I don’t think the purpose was to show up in ukraine sit on their behinds. I think the purpose was to win the war, the purpose was to carry out offensive military actions against the enemy (ukraine).

08.16 NATO Secretary General spoke of Russia using „hunger as a weapon“. Do you think this is true?

08.24 Stonberg needs to read some history and understand that when you cry havoc and unleash the dogs of war, accompanying the dogs of war are the four horsemen of the apocalypse and one of which is famine. You did this to Ukraine NATO not Russia. With war comes famine. Hunger is the inevitable product of large scale conflict.

10.30 In the early months, the Russian Military Leadership was replaced several times. Since Surovikin took the helm, the situation seems more stable. How do you access his war so far

10.46 First of all let’s talk about the relief of officers, the transition front peacetime military to a wartime military is a difficult one. What makes a leader successful in peacetime does not automatically translate into his success in wartime.

General Surovikin has always been a strong leader but he’s been to war, he’s combat tested, he understands war. If Russia is to win this war not just because of General Surovikin and other commanders with him.

Feel free to check out this being discussed @

https://ukraineuncensored.com/UUNET/posts/oRIlGPpR9N4mJIJeMeKP?refBy=4949346912359090296&refFrom=